Special Relativity: Some Notes | Home
I first saw the 1968 movie Planet of the Apes when it was first broadcast on television in 1973, when I was 13 years old.
Recall that the ending has Charlton Heston realizing he's been on the Earth the whole time;
that having travelled at great speed in his spacecraft for about 18 months, 700 years had passed on Earth upon his return.
That this was due to the time dilation effects of Einstein's special relativity was somehow vaguely known to me;
though I don't remember how I knew about this; and of course I had no real understanding of it.
But that was probably what first captured my imagination regarding this astonishing phenomenon.
Every few years (or decades) since then, I'd pick up a book on relativity for the layman,
hoping to get some inkling, only to put it aside when the mental contortions became too disagreeable.
Though it always seemed tantalizingly close to being "simple" enough for a rank amateur to understand,
given that the math involved seemed straightforward (indeed, only basic algebra is required for the special theory;
the general theory requiring much more advanced math).
In retirement I'm back at it for a bit, and with a bit more success.
Enough so that, as a part of the learning process, I wanted to see if I could explain to myself, from scratch, in writing,
my still nascent understanding of at least some aspects of special relativity. Thus these notes.
The Crux
As far as I understand it, what's really at the crux of the development and truth of Einstein's special relativity is this:
-
There is no absolute state of at-rest or in-motion. We can only say that one thing is moving relative to something else. Sitting on a smoothly moving train, we can just as well regard ourselves as stationary and the ground as moving past us. The laws of physics work the same either way; there's no experiment we can conduct that reveals which one is "really" moving and which is at-rest. With bodies moving at constant velocity there is no "really".
-
It is an experimentally established fact that the speed of light is constant, regardless of how the observer is moving.
Normally speeds are additive: If a train is moving at 100 mph and a ball is thrown forward at 50 mph, then an observer watching from a stationary platform would
observe the ball going by at 150 mph (speed of the train plus speed of the ball). But not so
with light. If a light is flashed forward from the train, the stationary observer would
still measure that light as travelling at the speed of light (called c which is 299,792,458 meters per second); not
the speed of the train plus the speed of light.
-
Accepting this counterintuitive and fundamental fact of nature, and remembering that the
formula for speed is distance divided by time (for example miles per hour),
we encounter a profound problem, an inconsistency.
If observers moving relative to one another must nevertheless measure the same speed for light,
then our ordinary assumptions about distance and time cannot both remain fixed.
-
Something has to “give” –
and it can't be the measured speed of light.
What must "give" instead are the "commonsense" (Newtonian) notions of absolute space and time.
The speed of light, not distance and time, has to be invariant in any formulation of these ideas.
If every observer must measure the same speed of light, regardless of motion,
then it's distance and time that must vary between observers, in such a way that their ratio
(distance divided by time) always gives the same fixed answer for the speed of light.
These are the basic conditions that led Einstein to develop the special theory of relativity (in 1905)
with its weird effects of time dilation and length contraction, its undermining of the very notion
of what it means for spatially separated events to simultaneous, and its novel concept of a unified spacetime
in place of the distinct and absolute time and space assumed by Newton (in 1687).
Newton even invoked God: He endures forever, and is everywhere present; and, by existing always and everywhere, He constitutes duration and space.
What's remarkable is that Einstein did this using purely logical reasoning.
He didn't draw from physical experiments,
or actually mess about with the trains or platforms or clocks or whatnot that he so often imagines in his writing.
He just took seriously that the constancy of speed of light, no matter the motion of observers
(which was the evidence at the time, but was explained away by various other theories, e.g. the ether),
was in fact a fixed law of nature.
And using what he called thought experiments (Gedankenexperiment in German),
and following rigorous logic,
crafted the theories that revolutionized over 200 year of established physics.
By the way, the "special" in special theory of relativity refers to the fact that this
theory deals primarily with uniform motion; in other words, constant velocity;
meaning, no acceleration (nor non-straight motion); the jargon is inertial reference frame. Einstein later developed the general theory of relativity (in 1915)
which deals with accleration (and gravity - which turns out to be effectively equivalent to acceleration), and is substantially more complicated.
My Notes
My Resources
Books
Videos